Drug testing and inspection is routine for many people: athletes, job applicants, employees, and students. Nevertheless, there are still people who feel that they privacies violated when agencies asking them to undergo drug tests. But it’s important because the law punishes anyone who is engaged in activities involving drugs – it does not recognize the difference between personal users, the users, or drugs. Drug testing also offers many benefits for individuals who need and those who submit to it. For employers who advocated drug testing, it is a way to minimize costs and secure profits. Initial investment in their employees has all been tested to ensure sustainable productivity and less tensions and problems among employees. They were able to weed out and reject the same employees and applicants are drug dependents.
Employers save by doing away with non-performing employees and by reducing production costs such as salaries and allowances. Professional athletes also undergo drug tests and inspections on a regular basis to monitor the performance of drug use to maintain justice and healthy competition. In addition to schools from major institutions that require drug testing, schools, especially universities, high schools, and the medium is subjected to it. The process includes drug testing mandatory and random drug tests among students and school personnel (i.e. teachers, maintenance, etc.). Although there are several – such as Kansas State Professor Bob Shoop – who feel that drug testing and examination is an invasive act against a person’s privacy and a violation of democratic rights, most think otherwise.
Most school officials feel that this is the effort necessary to maintain an atmosphere conducive to learning and student safety. That the schools reap the benefits as a result of drug screening is clear. In particular, drug testing reduces drug use in schools and markets, thus inhibiting drug sellers to sell on campus. Also there is a low incidence of school violence because most of the violent behavior of children is because of substance abuse. As a result, schools become more secure and peaceful, thus maintaining a positive learning environment. The effects of drug screening and assistance for students a more personal and less clear.
First, the substance and the surface of the child’s problem drug use make them open to receive help and counseling substance. The counselor agreed that the previous drug and substance abuse is detected, the easier it is for the kids off to stop the habit. Second, mandatory routine drug testing and screening discourage students from taking drugs and give them a valid, indisputable reason to refuse offers to use drugs. The survey reveals that children are more vulnerable to take drugs if their reasons for refusing to easily dispelled by the seller. Third, and perhaps most important, drug testing helps develop children’s potential even indirectly. If they are drug free environment, students are keener to find positive activities such as arts, sports, or writing and provide a better academic performance.
There is debate about the drug testing and screening, especially in the schools. But in a situation as delicate as the safety of students and drug use, may be better to balance the end of the support professional. Truly people, intelligent, healthy, and drug tested is better than free, drug-dependent people with a damaged future.
